Along with Baker v.Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Sims (1964), it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of "one person, one vote" to U.S. legislative bodies. Which of these models of congressional organization places the most emphasis on the growth of bureaucracies such as the congressional research service? University of California v. Bakke. Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark case concerning re-apportionment and redistricting. Along with Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims , it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of "one person, one vote" to U.S. legislative bodies. 1 Approved Answer Anjesh K answered on October 07, 2021 5 Ratings ( 14 Votes) Title :- Identify a difference in the facts of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) that. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent. In that case, the Court had declared re-apportionment a "political thicket." Worcester v. Georgia "A Distinct Community" Fletcher v. Peck. 276 (1962) James P. WESBERRY, Jr., and Candler Crim, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. S. Ernest VANDIVER, as Governor of the State of Georgia, and Ben W. Fortson, Jr., as Secretary of the State of Georgia, Defendants. Within four months of Wesberry, the Supreme Court ruled in its most famous reapportionment case, Reynolds v. Sims (1964), out of Alabama, that the U.S. Constitution required the equal valuation of votes in virtually all elections for officials from legislatively drawn districts, including representatives who served in. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population. Tech: Matt Latourelle Nathan Bingham Ryan Burch Kirsten Corrao Beth Dellea Travis Eden Tate Kamish Margaret Kearney Eric Lotto Joseph Sanchez. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". Limited time available to members means that increased constituent service creates less time for other activities. The United States Supreme Court ruled that federal courts could hear and rule on cases in which plaintiffs allege that re-apportionment plans violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Mahan v. Howell. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah. Wesberry based his claim on Article I, section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, which states that, "The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States," and on section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which reads in part: "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers . Baker, a Republican citizen of Shelby County, brought suit against the Secretary of State claiming that the state had not been redistricted since 1901 and Shelby County had more residents than rural districts. Syllabus Opinion, Black CDInPart, Clark Dissent, Harlan Opinion, Stewart Syllabus We have already remarked that the actual result reached in the Wesberry decision is in line with the Baker decision and should have caused no great surprise. Representatives retire rather than face probable defeat. The Court does have the power to decide this case, in contrast to Justice Harlans dissent. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663, which, after full discussion of Colegrove and all the opinions in it, held that allegations of disparities of population in state legislative districts raise justiciable claims on which courts . Justice Whittaker recused himself. In 1901, the Tennessee General Assembly passed an apportionment act. Fast Facts: Baker v. Carr Carr in 1962, the Supreme Court determined that this sort of population disparity violated the federal constitution. The best known of these cases is Reynolds v. Sims (1964). Sanders C. Explain the role stare decisis likely played in the Wesberryv. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population. Since the District Court obviously and correctly did not deem the asserted federal constitutional claim unsubstantial and frivolous, it should not have . Baker v. Carr was a Supreme Court case that determined apportionment to be a judicable issue. . WESBERRY v. SANDERS 376 U.S. 1 (1964) After baker v. carr (1962) held that legislative districting presented a justiciable controversy, the Supreme Court held in Wesberry, 8-1, that a state's congressional districts are required by Article I, section 2, of the Constitution to be as equal in population as is practicable. The district court decision was appealed the Supreme Court of the United States, which heard oral arguments November 18 and 19, 1963. Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. 11 Answer to test 16.12.2022, solved by verified expert Rajat Thapa s Specialist Mathematics, DAV Post Graduate College 1 336 answers 4.9 rating It opened the door to numerous historic cases in which the Supreme Court tackled questions of voting equality and representation in government. Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark case concerning re-apportionment and redistricting. Following is one of the steps in its synthesis. Chicago APA MLA. James P. Wesberry, Jr., was one of the citizens of Fulton County, Georgia, who filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia challenging the state apportionment law. In 1960, the federal census revealed that the state's population had grown by more than a million, totaling 3,567,089, and its voting population had swelled to 2,092,891. The Constitution does not call for equal sized districts, and therefore there is no constitutional right at stake. True or False: In purchasing a house, the points and other closing costs you pay are Within seven weeks of the decision, lawsuits had been filed in 22 states asking for relief in terms of unequal apportionment standards. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 191. The majoritys decision fails to base its holding on both history and existing precedent. (GIVEING OUT 100 POINTSSS), If the oceans of the earth got warmer from global warming, would the water of the oceans become more or less salty? We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Remanded to the District Court for consideration on the merits. Kristal_Acosta_-_Unit_2_FRQ_Retake_(Optional)_, Parker Bennett - Unit 2 Progress Check.docx, Supreme Court Case Study Baker v Carr.docx, Queens Gateway To Health Sciences Secondary Schoo, My AP Classroom FRQ 5 (Unit #3 FRQ Part A-Question #1).pdf, Shadae_Lovelace_-_The_Americans_-_Black_History_Month_-_Chapters_17_-_25_Excerpts.docx, important rules that are not enforceable by a court of law but that practically, 19 Benefits of using the Predictive Analysis The benefits of predictive, CJ 205 Project Two Motor Vehicle Crash Report Template.docx, Text 1 Robert S Pressman Software Engineering A Practitioners Approach 4th, Question 4 During a statewide protest of steelworkers on 1952 month of April, How are the nucleotides linked together to form a polynucleotide chain a In DNA, when the fund is divided If the people in town care only about their own net, Question 9 of 40 Marks 1 If bank is increased and power is kept constant during, What is the shortest verse in the bible John 1135 1 God Spoke 2 No More 3, Document Name Student Written Knowledge Assessment AURETR032 Created Date 12 th, _Diaspora unit 3 submission assignment.docx, A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all the information you need to know about the case to answer the prompts. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964. The case was brought by James P. Wesberry, Jr., against Georgia Governor Carl Sanders. Star Athletica, L.L.C. Cruel and Unusual Punishment. The statute required Tennessee to update its apportionment of senators and representatives every ten years, based on population recorded by the federal census. How did wesberry v Sanders change the makeup of Congress quizlet? ##### US 368 (1963); Reynolds v Sims 377 US 533 (1964); Wesberry v Sanders 376 US 1 (1964); ##### Avery v Midland Country 390 US 474 (1968); and Wells v Rockefeller 394 US 542 (1969). In order to provide a balance between conflicting needs of the more populated states versus the less so, they devised a system whereby both population densities were addressed. Did Georgia's congressional districts violate the Fourteenth Amendment or deprive citizens of the full benefit of their right to vote? Corte di conigliera. Baker, like many other residents in urban areas of Tennessee, found himself in a situation where his vote counted for less due to a lack of representation, his attorneys argued. (2020, August 28). What did the Supreme Court rule in Reynolds v Sims? We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. . That right is based in Art I, sec. How did the Supreme Court decide the Wesberry case? "Baker v. Carr: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact." Why would free riding occur in Congressional politics? The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". What do you think the effect of th The issue in the case is whether or not the complaint sufficiently alleged a violation of a federal right to the extent a district court would have jurisdiction. I, 2, reveals that those who framed the Constitution meant that, no matter what the mechanics of an election, whether statewide or by districts, it was population which was to be the basis of the House of Representatives. Must be correct. Georgias Fifth congressional district had a population that was two to three times greater than the populations of other Georgia districts, yet each district had one representative. Supreme Court of the United States . is change in the ocean salinity (saltiness) would be on the plants and animals that live in the ocean? the criteria for determining what constitutes a political question. what is the goal of the Speech or Debate Clause of Article 1, Section 6 of the constitution? The complaint does not state a claim under Fed. Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet. La Corte di Conigliera si riferisce alla Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti tra il 1953 e il 1969, quando la Conigliera di Conte servita come Presidente della Corte Suprema.. Il predecessore di conigliera Fred M. Vinson (b. Il 1890) era morto il 8 settembre 1953 dopo di 2.633 giorni in questa posizione (vedi qui).. La conigliera ha condotto una maggioranza liberale che ha . Each time redistricting plans were drawn up in accordance with the federal census and put to a vote, they failed to get enough votes to pass. Yes. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. Obergefell v. Hodges: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impacts, Katzenbach v. Morgan: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Washington v. Davis: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Bolling v. Sharpe: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Romer v. Evans: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Browder v. Gayle: Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Cooper v. Aaron: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Lawrence v. Texas: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Goldberg v. Kelly: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Oregon v. Mitchell: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact. Baker has standing to challenge Tennessees apportionment statutes. The three cases Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims established that states were required to conduct redistricting so that the districts had approximately equal populations. By 1960, population shifts in Tennessee made a vote in a small rural county worth 19 votes in a large urban county. Wesberry v. Sanders by Tom C. Clark Concurrence/dissent Justice Harlan's Dissent Mr. Justice CLARK, concurring in part and dissenting in part. An issue is considered a non-justiciable political question when one of six tests are met: This claim does not meet any of the six tests and is justiciable. Wesberry v. Sanders Argued: Nov. 18 and 19, 1963. Style: Chicago. if(document.getElementsByClassName("reference").length==0) if(document.getElementById('Footnotes')!==null) document.getElementById('Footnotes').parentNode.style.display = 'none'; Communications: Alison Graves Carley Allensworth Abigail Campbell Sarah Groat Caitlin Vanden Boom Why is having a fellow partisan as the chamber leader important? 2 of the Constitution does not mandate that congressional districts must be equal in population. Since the right to vote is inherent in the Constitution, each vote should hold equal weight. The Supreme Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives are ought to be approximately equal in the size of their population. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. Justice Felix Frankfurter dissented, joined by Justice John Marshall Harlan. Carr and Wesberry v. Sanders have? Is an equal protection challenge to a malapportionment of state legislatures considered non-justiciable as a political question? Baker v. Carr outlined that legislative apportionment is a justiciable non-political question. Why are parties stronger in the Senate than in the House? v. Varsity Brands, Inc. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, A Tennessee resident brought suit against the Secretary of State claiming that the failure to redraw the legislative districts every ten years, as outlined in the state. 435 (1964) Robert H. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. John L. MOORE, as Judge of Probate of Mobile County, Alabama, Agnes Baggett, as Secretary of State of the State of Alabama, Roy Mayhall, as Chairman of the Democratic Executive Committee, and Richmond Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendants. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 8 (1964) . Ch. Such failure violates both judicial restraint and separation of powers concerns under the Constitution. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population. Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case and an important point in the legal fight for the One man, one vote principle. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963) Gray v. Sanders. What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet? Which of these is a duty of the party whip? B In what way did Grover Cleveland's passion for hunting and fishing affect his job as president?In what way did Grover Cleveland's passion for hunting and fishing affect his job as president? Wesberry was the first real test of the "reapportionment revolution" set in motion by Baker v. Carr (1962), in which the Supreme Court held that federal courts could rule on reapportionment questions. Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors. Is wesberry v Sanders related to Baker v Carr? Georgia's Fifth Congressional District, which included Fulton County, was one of five voting districts created by a 1931 Georgia statute. C Did Cleveland seek a second term as president of the United States?Did Cleveland seek a second term as president of the United States? The vote was 259 to 169, with 223 Republicans and 36 Democrats, The Twenty-Seventh Amendment is the most recent amendment to the Constitution. Committees allow members to insert specialized allocations into bills. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.Along with Baker v.Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.Sanders (1964), it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of "one person, one vote . Bakers argument stated that because the districts had not been redrawn and the rural district had ten times fewer people, the rural votes essentially counted more denying him equal protection of the law. Differences between the House and Senate bills are resolved. Financial management consultant, auditor, international organization executive ( fin: finance service). Identify a difference in the facts of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision. In a 1946 case, Colegrove v. Green, the Supreme Court had ruled that apportionment should be left to the states to decide, the attorneys argued. Prior cases involving the same subject matter have been decided as nonjusticiable political questions. By its text, the Free Elections Clause prohibits laws that diminish the power of the electorate to dictate their own . Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition, George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry, Christina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole. Sanders decision a citizen of teh US for at least 9 years. Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case and an important point in the legal fight for the 'One man, one vote' principle. It established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues, when just a few years earlier such matter werecategorized as political questions outside the jurisdiction of the courts. See also Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 18 (1964) (While it may not be possible to draw congressional districts with mathematical precision, that is no excuse for ignoring our Constitution's plain objective of making equal representation for equal numbers of people the fundamental goal[. Reynolds v. Tennessee had acted "arbitrarily" and "capriciously" in not following redistricting standards, he claimed. In 1963, James P. Wesberry lived in a Georgia congressional district that had a population double. Wesberry alleged that the population of the Georgia's Fifth Congressional District, his home district, was two to three times larger than that of other districts in the state, thereby diluting the impact of his vote relative to other Georgia residents in violation of the United States Constitution. 112. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Nov 18 - 19, 1963 Decided Feb 17, 1964 Facts of the case James P. Wesberry resided in a Georgia congressional district with a population two to three times greater than that of other congressional districts in the state. 5/6 Political Science - American Gov. In your response, use substantive examples where appropriate. Moore v. Harper is an ongoing United States Supreme Court case related to the independent state legislature theory (ISL), arising from the redistricting of North Carolina's districts by the North Carolina legislature following the 2020 census, which the state courts found to be too artificial and partisan, and an extreme case of gerrymandering in favor of the Republican Party. Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972Wesberry v. Sanders - Significance, One Person, One Vote, Further Readings, Copyright 2023 Web Solutions LLC. Textually demonstrable constitutional commitment to another political branch; Lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving the issue; Impossibility of deciding the issue without making an initial policy determination of a kind not suitable for judicial discretion; Unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made; or. Writing for the Court, Justice Black dispensed with the political question issue immediately, agreeing with the appellants that Article I, section 2, properly interpreted, mandated the end of the Georgia apportionment statute: Justice Black indicated that exact equality of population in each district was not entirely possible. In 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the district court's dismissal on political question grounds was improper in light of the Court's ruling in Baker v. Carr, which found that constitutional challenges to legislative apportionment laws were not political questions and therefore were justiciable. The three cases Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims established that states were required to conduct redistricting so that the districts had approximately equal populations. Did Tennessee deny Baker equal protection when it failed to update its apportionment plan? The United States Senate was unaffected by the decision since the Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators. This court case was a very critical point in the legal fight for the principle of 'One man, one vote'. This decision, coupled with the one person, one vote opinions decided around the same time, had a massive impact on the makeup of the House of Representatives and on electoral politics in general. In addition, the majoritys analysis is clouded by too many indirect issues to focus on the real issue at hand. This site is using cookies under cookie policy . The current case is different than Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849), because it is brought under the Equal Protection Clause and Luther challenged malapportionment under the Constitutions Guaranty Clause. International Relations. There are no textually demonstrable commitments present regarding equal protection issues by other branches of government. Six-year terms mean only 1/3 of the chamber is re-elected at a time. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Baker petition to the United States Supreme Court. Charles S. Rhyme, Z. T. Osborn, Jr. Chief Lawyer for Appellees External Relations: Moira Delaney Hannah Nelson Caroline Presnell It does not store any personal data. Resp redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. [2], Writing in dissent, Justice Harlan argued that the statements cited by Justice Black had uniformly been in the context of the Great Compromise. If the vehicle was a light truck, what is the probability that it was manufactured by one of the U.S. automakers? In an opinion which explored the nature of "political questions" and the appropriateness of Court action in them, the U.S. Supreme Court held that legislative apportionment was a justiciable issue. Answer by Guest. ]). Civ. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population. Where does political representation occur most? The District Court was wrong to find that the Fifth district voters presented a purely political question which could not be decided by a court, and should be dismissed for want of equity. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, supports the principle that voters have standing to sue with regard to apportionment matters, and that such claims are justiciable. Research: Josh Altic Vojsava Ramaj What is the best explanation for why Congress bears ultimate responsibility in lawmaking? Most importantly, the history of how the House of Representatives came into being demonstrates that the founders wanted to ensure that each person had an equal voice in the political process in the House of Representatives. Why do large bills contain many small, targeted provisions? What is the tradeoff inherent in performing constituent service? When you visit the site, Dotdash Meredith and its partners may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Voters in the Fifth district sued the Governor and Secretary of State of Georgia, seeking to invalidate Georgias apportionment structure because their votes were given less weight compared to voters in other districts. Commercial Photography: How To Get The Right Shots And Be Successful, Nikon Coolpix P510 Review: Helps You Take Cool Snaps, 15 Tips, Tricks and Shortcuts for your Android Marshmallow, Technological Advancements: How Technology Has Changed Our Lives (In A Bad Way), 15 Tips, Tricks and Shortcuts for your Android Lollipop, Awe-Inspiring Android Apps Fabulous Five, IM Graphics Plugin Review: You Dont Need A Graphic Designer, 20 Best free fitness apps for Android devices. Attorneys on behalf of the state argued that the Supreme Court lacked grounds and jurisdiction to even hear the case. representatives voting with their fellow partisans on difficult votes, Why does the makeup of state government affect redistricting for Congress. Policy: Christopher Nelson Caitlin Styrsky Molly Byrne Katharine Frey Jimmy McAllister Samuel Postell Its existence today can be traced to a college student who proposed the idea in a term paper and was given a C by his, Respond to all parts of the question. Argued January 17, 1963. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. Equal Populations In Congressional Districts. Baker v. Carr "One Person, One Vote" Gray v. Sanders. 7 What was the Supreme Courts ruling in Reynolds v.united States? Like Wesberry, the Reapportionment Cases grew out of the Supreme Court's decision in Baker; if anything, they had an even more profound impact on the American electoral landscape, as they rendered nearly every state legislature unconstitutional. Residents were left feeling as though their votes were diluted. Wesberry v. Sanders. The district court dismissed the complaint, citing Colegrove v. Green, a 1946 case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that "challenges to apportionment of congressional districts raised only 'political' questions, which were not justiciable." Did Georgias apportionment statute violate the Constitution by allowing for large differences in population between districts even though each district had one representative? Pro. Unfortunately I can join neither the opinion of the Court nor the dissent of my Brother HARLAN. Wesberry filed suit, and the case was brought before a three-judge federal district court panel. That the claim is unsubstantial must be "very plain." Hart v. Keith Vaudeville Exchange, 262 U.S. 271, 274. Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims, Re: Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims, Quote from: A18 on August 04, 2005, 10:48:02 PM, Quote from: Emsworth on August 04, 2005, 10:57:21 PM, Quote from: Emsworth on August 05, 2005, 07:31:09 AM, Quote from: dougrhess on August 08, 2005, 04:30:49 PM, Topic: Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims (Read 13428 times). Justice William Brennan delivered the 6-2 decision. . Despite population growth, the Tennessee General Assembly failed to enact a re-apportionment plan. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer. All districts have roughly equal populations within states. Cornell. Mr. Justice Black's opinion, on the other hand, is another matter. Elianna Spitzer is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant. Explain how the decision in Baker v. Carr is similar to the decision in Wesberry v. Sanders. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). At the district court level, however, a three-judge panel hearing Wesberry's case relied upon an earlier U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Colegrove v. Green (1946), which held reapportionment to be a "political question" outside court jurisdiction. Do not include lone pairs in your answer. The one thing that one person, one vote decisions could not effect was the use of gerrymandering. C. Explain the role stare decisis likely played in the Wesberry v. Sanders decision. Baker v. Carr was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in the year 1962. Why do only 33 or 34 Senators face re-election in each cycle? Case Summary of Baker v. Carr: A Tennessee resident brought suit against the Secretary of State claiming that the failure to redraw the legislative districts every ten years, as outlined in the state constitution, resulted in rural votes holding more votes than urban votes. State legislatures often determine the boundaries of congressional districts. The statute offered a way for Tennessee to handle apportionment of senators and representatives as its population shifted and grew. Spitzer, Elianna. A district court panel declined to hear the case, finding that it could not rule on "political" matters like redistricting and apportionment. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. Can the Supreme Court rule on a case regarding apportionment? Emory Speer 1848-1918. To say that a vote is worth more in one district than in another would not only run counter to our fundamental ideas of democratic government, it would cast aside the principle of a House of Representatives elected "by the People," a principle tenaciously fought for and established at the Constitutional Convention.